Introduction
The symbiotic relationship between the quality of the learning experience and the retention of learned material is far more critical than many realize. While it’s easy to consider these two elements separate, they are inextricably linked. One can significantly bolster retention rates by enriching the learning experience through engagement, multisensory techniques, real-world application, and periodic assessments. In this extended blog post, let’s delve deeper into the scientific rationale behind this connection and how to leverage it for educational success.
How Learning Experience Affects Retention
Engagement and Emotional Investment
It has long been accepted that an engaged learner is more likely to remember information. Fredricks, Blumenfeld, and Paris have presented conclusive evidence suggesting that cognitive, behavioral, and emotional engagement are crucial for long-term retention (Fredricks et al., 2004). Engaged students listen and participate and are emotionally invested in the material, thus forming a deeper connection with the subject matter.
The Multisensory Advantage
Another variable that dramatically improves retention is multisensory learning. The work by Shams and Seitz demonstrates that using visual, auditory, and kinesthetic approaches in a learning environment significantly enhances the ability to remember content (Shams & Seitz, 2008). The multisensory approach helps learners build multiple neural pathways, making it easier to retrieve information.
Real-world Contextualization
Contextualizing the learning material with real-world applications and scenarios can enhance both the learning experience and retention. Studies by Bransford, Brown, and Cocking indicate that learners are more likely to remember information when relating it to real-world contexts (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2000). This approach provides learners with a framework that aids in future recall.
Cognitive Load Management
Another consideration is cognitive load, a concept central to Cognitive Load Theory developed by Sweller (Sweller, 1988). A well-structured learning experience helps manage the cognitive load by organizing information efficiently, leading to better retention.
Techniques to Enrich Learning Experience and Boost Retention
Active Learning
Active learning techniques such as discussions, problem-solving sessions, and group projects have been shown to be remarkably effective in improving memory retention. According to a study by Prince, active learning strategies can boost comprehension and recall (Prince, 2004).
Spaced Repetition and Interleaving
Long-term retention can be improved by revisiting material over time, known as spaced repetition. Cepeda et al. demonstrated that this technique helps in the long-term retention of learned material (Cepeda et al., 2008). Interleaving, or mixing different topics or subjects to improve learning, is another technique gaining popularity for its effectiveness in enhancing retention (Rohrer, 2012).
Formative Assessments
Formative assessments, such as periodic quizzes and interactive exercises, provide immediate feedback and make the learning experience more dynamic. According to Black and Wiliam, formative assessments enhance engagement and contribute to better retention (Black & Wiliam, 1998).
Future Trends
The advent of EdTech and Learning Science will likely see more personalized learning experiences designed to optimize retention. Adaptive learning platforms use machine learning algorithms to customize study schedules, creating a more engaging and effective learning experience (Koller et al., 2013).
Conclusion
The learning experience and retention of educational material are two sides of the same coin. Educators and learners alike can achieve more successful educational outcomes by recognizing this symbiotic relationship and incorporating scientifically proven techniques.
References
- Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
- Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 411-417.
- Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.
- Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.
- Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
- Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2008). Spacing effects in learning: A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1095-1102.
- Rohrer, D. (2012). Interleaving helps students distinguish among similar concepts. Educational Psychology Review, 24(3), 355-367.
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
- Koller, D., Ng, A., Chuong, D., & Chen, Z. (2013). Retention and intention in massive open online courses: In-depth. Educause Review, 48(3), 62-63.
Leave a Reply
Say something nice